It's just about 1:20 am, Monday, July 4th. My day has been full, full, full. I left the lounge full of chatty writers early (10:30pm) because I had so much work to do. I left my dorm door open, just like in the olden days--to be friendly and for air circulation. A fellow Korean-American writer walked in and wanted me to talk about my novel excerpt (she's in my workshop and I'm on the hot seat tomorrow). Uh, oh. I thought. What's bomb is this woman going to drop on me? She was actually pretty supportive and we got into a long discussion about the state of Korean American literary fiction, characterization, writing against type, my novel, her novel, her life, and so on. I'm sure that you can imagine that this went on for quite a while. But this is the kind of thing that happens around here--which is why I don't sleep much.
I was very energized by my meeting with Victor today. A little word about context: Just before the meeting, we attended a class on how discovery or reversal in a story are internal things that must be manifested in external change. (Very, very true) In this context, people began to talk about how much they distrusted epiphanies. Too much in our culture is already didactic, they said--commercials, religion. What they wanted to see in a story was a small moment of change. Very small. Very quiet. The examples we studied were beautifully rendered stories that I truly admire. But as I met with Victor I commented to him that, while I was sympathetic to this current sensibility against epiphanies (and certainly I'm against poorly rendered ones), that I had no problem with characters changing in a big or lasting way. I had no problem with change, I told him. In fact, that's partly what drew me to stories in the first place--to see change and to change myself in the process. I observed that the class reflected a very postmodern way of looking at the world (yes, I know that I'm repeating myself to some of you--but I hadn't said it to Victor yet, okay?)
He commented on how, throughout the ages and in all cultures, humanity has been concerned with stories about good and evil. Perhaps, he said, the current sensibility comes from an arrogance in believing that we have somehow evolved beyond Good and Evil (with caps) and are able to only tell stories about good and bad (no caps).
Victor is also a fan of Flannery O'Connor. He is open to all kinds of non-literary styles, including genre fiction, especially horror. While this is not quite my cup of tea, I can tell that he is going to energize and push my writing. The guy isn't nervous about violence. Likes it, in fact. And since my project has to do with the war, my conversations with him opened up whole new channels of ideas and inspiration for me. So far, when I write about the war...I write like a girl. I'm going to try newer, riskier stuff--blow things up and have racing tanks and RPG's or whatever they had back then. Cool, huh? I wonder if this means that I will have to make myself sit through Saving Private Ryan again?